Friday, February 23, 2024
-Advertisement-
Reimagining Public Sector Analytics
Reimagining Public Sector Analytics
HomeEnterprise ITArtificial IntelligenceFormer Trump lawyer Michael Cohen admits using Google Bard, citing bogus cases

Former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen admits using Google Bard, citing bogus cases

Follow Tech Observer on Google News

In a clear case of serious pitfalls of emerging legal technologies, Michael Cohen, former attorney to Donald Trump, admitted to using Google's AI service, Bard, to generate legal citations that ended up in a federal court filing.

Google News

In a clear case of serious pitfalls of emerging technologies such , , former attorney to , admitted to using Google's AI service, Bard, to generate hallucinated legal citations that ended up in a federal court filing.

Cohen, seeking an early termination of court supervision from his 2018 campaign finance conviction, filed paperwork through his attorney, David M. Schwartz. However, the documents included references to fictitious legal cases. Federal District Court Judge Jesse M. Furman, unable to locate the cited cases, challenged Schwartz to validate the sources or provide a detailed explanation of their origin.

This incident, first reported by The New York Times, shows the potential pitfalls of emerging legal technologies.

In a sworn declaration, Cohen confessed to not being fully aware of the “emerging trends (and related risks) in legal technology.” He acknowledged using Bard, unaware that the AI could generate plausible but non-existent citations. Cohen also pointed to his lawyer's failure to verify the authenticity of these cases before submission to the court.

This scenario is not isolated. Steven Schwartz, a lawyer utilising OpenAI's ChatGPT, and the attorney for Fugees rapper Pras Michel have also been implicated in similar AI-related errors. Michel's lawyer was accused of using an AI tool, in which he might have had a financial interest, for crafting closing arguments.

These incidents shed light on a growing concern in the legal profession about the reliability and ethical use of AI-generated content. While AI offers efficiency and convenience, its capacity to create convincing but fraudulent information poses significant risks, especially in sensitive legal contexts.

The fallout from Cohen's Bard debacle is not just legal but also political. As a key witness in the Manhattan criminal case against Trump, the credibility of his testimony may now be under scrutiny. Trump's defense team could leverage this AI mishap to discredit Cohen's reliability.

Legal experts caution against the uncritical adoption of AI in legal proceedings. As AI continues to evolve, the legal profession faces the challenge of balancing innovation with integrity, ensuring that the pursuit of technological advancement does not compromise the foundations of justice and due process.

Get the day's headlines from Tech Observer straight in your inbox

By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy, T&C and consent to receive newsletters and other important communications.
Tech Observer Desk
Tech Observer Desk
Tech Observer Desk at TechObserver.in is a team of technology reporters led by a senior editor who brings latest updates and developments from the world of technology.
- Advertisement -
Reimagining Public Sector Analytics
Reimagining Public Sector Analytics
- Advertisement -Veeam
- Advertisement -Reimagining Public Sector Analytics
- Advertisement -ESDS SAP Hana

Subscribe to our Newsletter

83000+ Industry Leaders read it everyday

By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy, T&C and consent to receive newsletters and other important communications.
- Advertisement -

HFCL to establish Rs 144 crore optical fiber cable plant in Poland

For this purpose, HFCL will create a new stepdown subsidiary under HFCL B.V., its wholly-owned subsidiary in the Netherlands.

RELATED ARTICLES