Blockchain implementations are still POCs

Must Read

A Balancing Act: Personal Data Protection Bill gives more power to govt, data can be processed abroad

The Personal Data Protection Bill is likely to water-down many suggestions of draft Bill prepared by the Justice BN Srikrishna.

Over 50% candidates with Hindi, regional languages clears UPSC civil service exam in 2018

In 2018, a total of 812 candidates were recommended for central civil services, among them 485 candidates were those who had chosen Hindi or other regional languages as mother tongue

Modi govt to amend IT Act to trace rogue messages on WhatsApp

The Union government said that to trace rogue messages on platforms such as WhatsApp, it has proposed to amend the Information Technology (Intermediaries Guidelines) Rules, 2011 of the IT Act, 2000
Tech Observer Desk
Tech Observer Desk
TechObserver.in covers e-governance, enterprise IT, startups, telecom and consumer electronics.

implementations are mostly POCs being done in the hope to convert them to fully fledged projects. The main real world implementations are still not mainstream. There are many factors in play but one of the most prominent one is positioning of the technology itself.

Satoshi Nakamoto and his Bitcoin are for sure the reason for the popularity of the Blockchain or DLT in general. Blockchain technology professionals understood the problems with Bitcoin technology, its positioning and moved on with furthering the idea with new innovations.

The activists and enthusiasts are however still fixated with promises of the Bitcoin’s whitepaper, and would want to eliminate the intermediary with Blockchain technology. One should acknowledge that the activists helped a lot to keep Blockchain active in public memory for a decade when there was no real impact on the ground. One can understand their enthusiasm and motivation.

The problem is with good intention people in business and technology community who are still in the awe of the promises of Bitcoin. They are now hurting the cause and becoming the burden by forcing the one thought or one defined checklist for any Blockchain implementation. I think technology should be allowed to evolve organically and is not made the prisoner of the ‘original idea’.

I believe ‘Identifying the business problem you want to solve’, and will be the key to the success of any Blockchain implementation (rather than the phrase ‘Blockchain implementation’ it should rather be ‘Blockchain network setup’ and ‘application implementations’ on that setup).

Eliminating intermediaries is Utopian idea where one is asking to get into business transaction wherein one has to believe set of programmers of Blockchain platform rather than entity that can be dragged in the court of law in the situations of dispute.

I think the right approach is to eliminate the frictions in business processes where multiple parties are involved. Intermediary could still be there as entity to ensure accountability, but Blockchain could minimize the inefficiencies by redesigning the business processes where entire chain is acting on same platform as a distributed workflow. And this workflow is not owned by a single entity but by all in the network.

One also has to start thinking of building capacity within organization to setup the necessary infrastructure so that business processes can be redesigned.

The second good thing one has to attempt is to choose the ‘right platform’ to setup Blockchain network and build applications.

The author, Pushpendra Baghel is Head Solutions and Technology Advisory Group at

- Advertisement -
avatar
1000
  Subscribe  
Notify of
- Advertisement -

Latest in TECH

Modi govt mulling to bring national level blockchain framework

While replying to question in the Lok Sabha, the Union minister of state for electronics and IT Sanjay Dhotre said that an approach paper on National Level Blockchain Framework is being prepared
- Advertisement - ESDS eNight Cloud Hosting

Related Articles